The 15 Scope 3 Categories Explained
ARTICLE

The 15 Scope 3 Categories Explained

Published June 25, 2026 · 1 min read
Fabian Merup

Fabian Merup

Writer
Mattias Nad

Mattias Nad

Research Analyst

Scope 3 emissions cover everything that happens in your value chain: upstream suppliers and downstream customers. For most companies, Scope 3 represents the vast majority of their total carbon footprint. Here is what each category covers and why it matters.

15
GHG Protocol categories
70-93%
of total emissions for most companies
8+7
upstream + downstream
Upstream (categories 1-8)
Vector (78)
1. Purchased Goods & Services

To get started, your team uploads ERP and invoice data to Bardo's secure dataroom. Bardo handles the enrichment step, including cleaning up messy data from multiple sources, then structuring and mapping it for calculation workflows.

Frame
2. Capital Goods

To get started, your team uploads ERP and invoice data to Bardo's secure dataroom. Bardo handles the enrichment step, including cleaning up messy data from multiple sources, then structuring and mapping it for calculation workflows.

Frame (1)
3. Fuel & Energy Activities

To get started, your team uploads ERP and invoice data to Bardo's secure dataroom. Bardo handles the enrichment step, including cleaning up messy data from multiple sources, then structuring and mapping it for calculation workflows.

Frame (2)
4. Upstream Transport

To get started, your team uploads ERP and invoice data to Bardo's secure dataroom. Bardo handles the enrichment step, including cleaning up messy data from multiple sources, then structuring and mapping it for calculation workflows.

Frame (3)
5. Waste in Operations

To get started, your team uploads ERP and invoice data to Bardo's secure dataroom. Bardo handles the enrichment step, including cleaning up messy data from multiple sources, then structuring and mapping it for calculation workflows.

Frame (4)
6. Business Travel

To get started, your team uploads ERP and invoice data to Bardo's secure dataroom. Bardo handles the enrichment step, including cleaning up messy data from multiple sources, then structuring and mapping it for calculation workflows.

Frame (5)
7. Employee Commuting

To get started, your team uploads ERP and invoice data to Bardo's secure dataroom. Bardo handles the enrichment step, including cleaning up messy data from multiple sources, then structuring and mapping it for calculation workflows.

Frame (6)
8. Upstream Leased Assets

To get started, your team uploads ERP and invoice data to Bardo's secure dataroom. Bardo handles the enrichment step, including cleaning up messy data from multiple sources, then structuring and mapping it for calculation workflows.

Downstream (categories 9-15)
Frame (7)
1. Downstream Transport

To get started, your team uploads ERP and invoice data to Bardo's secure dataroom. Bardo handles the enrichment step, including cleaning up messy data from multiple sources, then structuring and mapping it for calculation workflows.

Frame (8)
2. Processing of Sold Products

To get started, your team uploads ERP and invoice data to Bardo's secure dataroom. Bardo handles the enrichment step, including cleaning up messy data from multiple sources, then structuring and mapping it for calculation workflows.

Frame (9)
3. Use of Sold Products

To get started, your team uploads ERP and invoice data to Bardo's secure dataroom. Bardo handles the enrichment step, including cleaning up messy data from multiple sources, then structuring and mapping it for calculation workflows.

Frame (10)
4. End-of-Life Treatment

To get started, your team uploads ERP and invoice data to Bardo's secure dataroom. Bardo handles the enrichment step, including cleaning up messy data from multiple sources, then structuring and mapping it for calculation workflows.

Frame (11)
5. Downstream Leased Assets

To get started, your team uploads ERP and invoice data to Bardo's secure dataroom. Bardo handles the enrichment step, including cleaning up messy data from multiple sources, then structuring and mapping it for calculation workflows.

Frame (12)
6. Franchises

To get started, your team uploads ERP and invoice data to Bardo's secure dataroom. Bardo handles the enrichment step, including cleaning up messy data from multiple sources, then structuring and mapping it for calculation workflows.

Frame (13)
7. Investments

To get started, your team uploads ERP and invoice data to Bardo's secure dataroom. Bardo handles the enrichment step, including cleaning up messy data from multiple sources, then structuring and mapping it for calculation workflows.

Where most of your footprint lives

For services-oriented companies, investment firms, and multi-entity groups, Category 1 (Purchased Goods & Services) is where the bulk of emissions concentrate. Most of what your company buys gets counted here: from office supplies and IT equipment to consulting fees and raw materials.

This is also the category where measurement method matters most. A spend-based approach assigns the same emission factor to every dollar spent in a category. An activity-based approach identifies the actual product and matches it to specific lifecycle data.

Spend-based vs activity-based: why the method matters

The GHG Protocol allows multiple calculation approaches for Scope 3. The choice of method directly affects the quality and usefulness of your data.

The problem

The accuracy gap in Category 1

When a company buys 100 MacBook Airs at €1,199 each, a spend-based estimate assigns the generic "Office machinery and computers" emission factor to the total spend, lumping ultralight laptops with servers and industrial PCs. The result: 340 kg CO2e per unit. An activity-based approach identifies the exact model (MacBook Air M5, 13") and uses Apple's published LCA data: 119 kg CO2e per unit. The spend-based method inflates the result by nearly 3x.

The difference compounds. Across a procurement portfolio of thousands of suppliers and millions in spend, spend-based estimates consistently inflate totals, misallocate emissions across categories, and hide the real hotspots.

Read more: How product carbon footprints work at the transaction level

Spend-based vs activity-based: why the method matters

The GHG Protocol allows multiple calculation approaches for Scope 3. The choice of method directly affects the quality and usefulness of your data.

Spend-based

×-1
Multiplies spend by industry-average emission factors
×-1
Multiplies spend by industry-average emission factors
×-1
Multiplies spend by industry-average emission factors
×-1
Multiplies spend by industry-average emission factors

Activity-based

×-2
Maps each product to specific LCA data
×-2
Maps each product to specific LCA data
×-2
Maps each product to specific LCA data
×-2
Maps each product to specific LCA data
The difference is not just accuracy. Activity-based data lets you identify which specific suppliers, products, and procurement categories drive your footprint. That turns carbon reporting from a compliance exercise into an operational tool.

What CSRD expects from your Scope 3 data

Under CSRD and ESRS E1, companies must report Scope 3 emissions that can withstand external assurance. The current requirement is limited assurance, but even that demands traceable, documented calculations, something spend-based estimates struggle to survive.

In practice, this means:

  • A traceable path from invoice → what was bought → reported emission
  • Documented emission factors with source, method, and quality rating
  • Consistent scope boundaries and category definitions year over year

Spend-based estimates end at a category-level average with no connection to actual purchases. Under these requirements, that is increasingly difficult to defend. The direction of regulation is clear: more granularity, more traceability, more accountability.

Try for yourself

See what we'd find in your data.

We'll analyze a sample of your invoices and show you what real carbon data looks like for your organization.
See it in action
MessagesSquare Talk to our team
Ellipse 2 (1)