For services-oriented companies, investment firms, and multi-entity groups, Category 1 (Purchased Goods & Services) is where the bulk of emissions concentrate. Most of what your company buys gets counted here: from office supplies and IT equipment to consulting fees and raw materials.
This is also the category where measurement method matters most. A spend-based approach assigns the same emission factor to every dollar spent in a category. An activity-based approach identifies the actual product and matches it to specific lifecycle data.
The GHG Protocol allows multiple calculation approaches for Scope 3. The choice of method directly affects the quality and usefulness of your data.
Under CSRD and ESRS E1, companies must report Scope 3 emissions that can withstand external assurance. The current requirement is limited assurance, but even that demands traceable, documented calculations, something spend-based estimates struggle to survive.
In practice, this means:
Spend-based estimates end at a category-level average with no connection to actual purchases. Under these requirements, that is increasingly difficult to defend. The direction of regulation is clear: more granularity, more traceability, more accountability.